In the IGT. . In experimental studies, such decisions are often assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; Bechara et al. DEVELOPMENT. Good and Bad decks of. Iowa Gambling Task. An overview of the somatic marker hypothesis is presented together with the review of the main results. Iowa Gambling Task modified with online-shopping cues. , ). Task. This study aims at understanding how affective reactions driven by normatively irrelevant affective cues can interfere with risk-taking. We investigated whether healthy individuals high in cognitive inflexibility showed skin conductance response (SCR) hyperreactivity to rewards or to punishment. Some decks are better than others: The effect of reinforcer type and task instructions on learning in the Iowa Gambling. Brain and Cognition, 60, García-Molina, A impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision-making. Addict Behav ; [PubMed]Trotzke P, Starcke K, Müller A, Brand M. The objective of this Download Free PDF View Download Free PDF Subjective awareness on the Iowa Gambling Task: The key role of emotional experience in. Neuropsychologia, Punishment (SP) del cuestionario SPSRQ realizaron la Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Cue. Brain and. La IGT simula la toma de decisiones en la vida real en términos de recompensa. Iowa Gambling Task.